ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR), late-onset FGR, small for gestational age (SGA) and adequate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses and adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study in which 4 groups were evaluated: 1 - early-onset FGR (before 32 weeks) (n = 20), 2 - late-onset FGR (at or after 32 weeks) (n = 113), 3 - SGA (n = 59), 4 - AGA (n = 476). The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the time from the diagnosis of FGR to birth. Logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses with FGR and SGA. RESULTS: A longer time between the diagnosis and birth was observed for AGA than for late FGR fetuses (p < 0.001). The model including the type of FGR and the gestational age at birth was significant in predicting the risk of hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) (p < 0.001). The model including only the type of FGR predicted the risk of needing neonatal resuscitation (p < 0.001), of respiratory distress (p < 0.001), and of birth at < 32, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fetal growth restriction and SGA were associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. The type of FGR at the moment of diagnosis was an independent variable to predict respiratory distress and the need for neonatal resuscitation. The model including both the type of FGR and the gestational age at birth predicted the risk of needing neonatal ICU hospitalization.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar o efeito da restrição de crescimento fetal (RCF) precoce, RCF tardio, fetos pequenos constitucionais para idade gestacional (PIG) e fetos adequados para idade gestacional (AIG) sobre resultados adversos perinatais. MéTODOS: Estudo longitudinal e retrospectivo, no qual foram avaliados quatro grupos: 1 RCF precoce (< 32 semanas) (n = 20), 2 RCF tardio (≥ 32 semanas) (n = 113), 3 PIG (n = 59), 4 AIG (n = 476). A curva de Kaplan-Meier foi utilizada para comparar o tempo entre o diagnóstico da RCF e o parto. Regressão logística foi utilizada para determinação dos melhores previsores de resultados perinatais adversos entre os fetos com RCF e PIG. RESULTADOS: Os fetos AIGs apresentaram maior tempo entre o diagnóstico e parto, enquanto fetos RCF tardio apresentaram menor tempo (p < 0,001). O modelo contendo tanto os tipos de RCF quanto a idade gestacional no momento do parto foi significativo em predizer o risco de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) neonatal (p < 0,001). O modelo incluindo apenas o tipo de FGR prediz o risco de ressuscitação neonatal (p < 0,001), de desconforto respiratório (p < 0,001) e de nascimento < 32, 34 e 37 semanas de gestação, respectivamente (p < 0,001). CONCLUSãO: Os desvios do crescimento, RCF e PIG, foram associados a resultados perinatais adversos. O tipo de RCF no momento do diagnóstico foi variável independente para predizer necessidade de reanimação neonatal e desconforto respiratório. O modelo que incluiu o tipo de FGR e idade gestacional no nascimento prediz o risco de necessitar de internação em UTI neonatal.
Subject(s)
Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnostic imaging , Gestational Age , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Pregnancy , Prognosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
Abstract Objective To evaluate the association between early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR), late-onset FGR, small for gestational age (SGA) and adequate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses and adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective longitudinal study in which 4 groups were evaluated: 1 - early-onset FGR (before 32 weeks) (n=20), 2 - late-onset FGR (at or after 32 weeks) (n=113), 3 - SGA (n=59), 4 - AGA (n=476). The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the time from the diagnosis of FGR to birth. Logistic regression was used to determine the best predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses with FGR and SGA. Results A longer timebetween the diagnosis and birthwas observed forAGAthan for late FGR fetuses (p<0.001). The model including the type of FGR and the gestational age at birth was significant in predicting the risk of hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) (p<0.001). The model including only the type of FGR predicted the risk of needing neonatal resuscitation (p<0.001), of respiratory distress (p<0.001), and of birth at<32, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion Fetal growth restriction and SGA were associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. The type of FGR at the moment of diagnosis was an independent variable to predict respiratory distress and the need for neonatal resuscitation. The model including both the type of FGR and the gestational age at birth predicted the risk of needing neonatal ICU hospitalization.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o efeito da restrição de crescimento fetal (RCF) precoce, RCF tardio, fetos pequenos constitucionais para idade gestacional (PIG) e fetos adequados para idade gestacional (AIG) sobre resultados adversos perinatais. Métodos Estudo longitudinal e retrospectivo, no qual foram avaliados quatro grupos: 1 - RCF precoce (< 32 semanas) (n=20), 2 - RCF tardio ( 32 semanas) (n=113), 3 - PIG (n=59), 4 - AIG (n=476). A curva de Kaplan-Meier foi utilizada para comparar o tempo entre o diagnóstico da RCF e o parto. Regressão logística foi utilizada para determinação dosmelhores previsores de resultados perinatais adversos entre os fetos com RCF e PIG. Resultados Os fetos AIGs apresentaram maior tempo entre o diagnóstico e parto, enquanto fetos RCF tardio apresentaram menor tempo (p<0,001). O modelo contendo tanto os tipos de RCF quanto a idade gestacional no momento do parto foi significativo em predizer o risco de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) neonatal (p<0,001). O modelo incluindo apenas o tipo de FGR prediz o risco de ressuscitação neonatal (p<0,001), de desconforto respiratório (p<0,001) e de nascimento<32, 34 e 37 semanas de gestação, respectivamente (p<0,001). Conclusão Os desvios do crescimento, RCF e PIG, foram associados a resultados perinatais adversos. O tipo de RCF no momento do diagnóstico foi variável independente para predizer necessidade de reanimação neonatal e desconforto respiratório. O modelo que incluiu o tipo de FGR e idade gestacional no nascimento prediz o risco de necessitar de internação em UTI neonatal.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Gestational Age , Fetal Growth Retardation , Prognosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy , Time Factors , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Longitudinal Studies , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Critical CareABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Giant cystadenocarcinomas of the ovary are rarely described conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: The authors describe a 57-year-old Brazilian woman who presented with an increase in abdominal girth in February 2003. Imaging studies showed a giant abdominal pelvic mass with probable origin in the right ovary. Cancer antigen-125 was elevated, while carcinoembrionic antigen and alpha-fetoprotein were normal. Total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and omentectomy were done. The mass weighed 40Kg, and the histopathology study revealed a mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. She underwent chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin with no side effects. Under follow-up for more than 10 years, she is asymptomatic and with normal imaging and laboratory parameters, including the cancer antigen-125 marker. CONCLUSION: This huge tumor evolved for a long time unsuspected and without metastases in a patient from a developing region. The diagnostic and management challenges posed by this unexpected and unusual presentation of an ovarian cystadenocarcinoma are discussed.
